Andrew Sharpless: – working with Bloomberg. And then I went away and I thought about a conversation I had had in Geneva with the Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Mr. He listened to me very respectfully talk about how there were all kinds of measures of serious problems in the ocean.
Therefore turned into very clear for me how the more components of effort in fact work in conjunction getting a larger impact
In which he basically told you… you will find an excellent million members of China to feed. The west could have been overfishing the fresh new waters for a long time. We are going to get the turn. And i also left impression that we had extremely mishandled the latest appointment. Here, I’d a message that has been that individuals have much more dinner away from a refreshing sea. I had entirely did not generate your remember that trigger the guy read myself supplying the brand of old-fashioned preservation message that’s a significant one to but it is only no more than biodiversity shelter.
That forced me to see, well, wait a moment, we are able to measure what we should are trying to do in a clinical metric which is the restaurants worth of good remodeled sea, meals funding out-of reconstructed water. Exactly how many edibles you may we provide of a beneficial rebuilt water? I named Bloomberg support and that i said, waiting a minute, we have a different tip. And let us discuss which restaurants, the food metric.
Melissa Wright: You were able to bring back that epiphany and help develop what’s now a 3-country effort around overfishing. And I saw this work in action and in a recent trip to Brazil and was so impressed and inspired. And one of the side trips that we went on when I was in Brazil was to Itajai, and which I understand is one of the largest commercial fishing ports in Brazil.
Andrew Sharpless: They’re surprising big, aren’t they? I mean you – the audience should understand we’re not talking about like two guys in a little, you know, 15-foot skiff.
Melissa Wright: And Monica, the Brazilian rep from Oceana was telling me about how there was a lack of information, now, about what those boats are bringing in, which species, how much, when, and where they’ve been fishing because the country stopped monitoring their landings or their catch a few years ago. Can you speak to what impact that has had on the fisheries in Brazil and the work of Oceana?
Andrew Sharpless: So I’ve taken that same trip with you and it’s very impressive. The scale of our ability to catch ocean fish is enormous. And you see it as you go down that river and you’ll see these vessels that are stories and stories high – four or five or six stories high. So amazingly Brazil has collected no data on its own fisheries since 2008. Brazil’s had a kind of a budget crisis in that year. One of the ways they saved money was by cancelling all data collection efforts on fishery catches.
Wu
Thereby cooperating with, you know, all of our people indeed there we have been now event landings analysis during the an authoritative and you can reliable method and you may revealing you to upwards. And they’re today event data towards from the 40% of your own complete fishery catch.
Г¤r bridge of love pГҐ riktigt?
Andrew Sharpless: Yeah. Which is a pretty basic step, we can all see how that starts to set the conditions for, you know, scientific and sensible management. We’ve just launched together with this little enterprise called Google, and Sky Truth, an NGO, is our other partner. It’s called Global Fishing Watch. And your listeners can go to .
