Lamb, M. Age., & Gilbride, K. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict relationships (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Perceived resemblance and you can matchmaking success one of relationship partners: An enthusiastic idiographic method
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). In the event that I am not saying very hot, have you been sizzling hot or otherwise not?: Physical-attractiveness analysis and you will dating choice while the a purpose of an individual’s own attractiveness. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Links ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other personal relationships. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of aspiration. Into the J. McV. Appear (Ed.), Identification while the behavior conditions (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Drive. [ Website links ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating dating dating fate that have insiders’ and outsiders’ angle: Who and you will what exactly is asked matters. Individual Relationships, thirteen, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship top quality when you look at the newly weds: A couple founded approach. Record regarding Character and you will Personal Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]
Madden, M., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Matchmaking. Washington, DC: Report with the Pew Internet sites & American Life Enterprise. Recovered , out-of [ Backlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Determining the precision out-of forecasts regarding the dating dating: Exactly how and exactly why carry out lovers’ forecasts vary from those individuals produced by perceiver? Identity and Public Psychology Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing situations throughout the initiation regarding heterosexual relationships. Report demonstrated at the Basic Around the world Appointment for the Individual Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.An excellent. (2000). Electronic matchmaking and you will virtual associated: Conceptualizing desktop mediated romantic dating. Loved ones, forty-two, 187-192. [ Website links ]
Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually actual resemblance important for attraction? An effective meta-research of genuine and you can recognized resemblance. Journal of Societal and personal Dating, twenty five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]
Morry, Meters. M. (2005). Relationships fulfillment because good predictor regarding similarity recommendations; A test of one’s destination-similarity theory. Diary away from Personal and private Matchmaking, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Links ]
Diary out of Personal and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880
Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). The fresh destination-similarity theory among cross-sex family relations: Relationship pleasure, sensed parallels, and you will thinking-serving thinking. Diary of Social and private Relationships, 24, Colombianska kvinnor brudar 117-138. [ Website links ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of your own SVR concept regarding dyadic combining. Log regarding ily, 44, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can breakup: An excellent 14-season longitudinal examination of black lovers and light lovers. Journal from Social and personal Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh love algorithm Suits thinks it’s discover an algorithm to possess ruling the web dating team: A technological strategy for finding Mr. or Ms. Best. Organization 2.0 Mag. Retrieved on regarding [ Hyperlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Identification parallels for the couples. Identification and you will Individual Distinctions, forty five, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Partner choice: Just what features would folks desire within quick-name sexual and you may enough time-title close lovers? Diary out of Therapy and you will People Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh role of the care about from the initiation and you may span of public communication. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may incompatible matchmaking (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
